When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Traditional skills and lifestyle have their own importance. Some people are not in favour to keep these alive while others have contrast viewpoint.

Although

technology and new

techniques

are vital, I believe conventional ways are crucial to remember.

Firstly

, old things are the identity of a culture. These represent the individuality and heritage of a place and city. Every place has its own speciality which is identified from its lifestyle. If every country and nation follow the same modern

techniques

and living style,

this

will be lost.

For instance

, Israel has its own unique way to obtain olive oil and

this

oil is worldwide famous.

Therefore

, to maintain individual attributes, it is mandatory to safeguard the old

techniques

.

Secondly

, to attract tourists and boost the economy, it is beneficial to reserve old

techniques

. Travellers get attract by these and prefer to visit which support the economical development of nations. They like to learn these skills and inculcate.

For instance

, Itlay is promoting holidays which include teaching baking pizzas in old styles and numerous tourists are joining

this

. If these skills are not preserved, tourists will not find anything unique.

Therefore

, these

techniques

are a source of attraction for visitors which

further

help in earning and creating a strong economy. In conclusion,

c

Add an article

the

show examples

ontemporary world appreciates technology which is acceptable but traditional lifestyle has its own importance. I strongly disagree with

this

notion that people should no longer need these to remember. In fact, a balance of both should be created so that

a

Change the article

the

show examples

best approach is applied.