The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind. However, it has made little difference in most people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The world has seen significant innovations and discoveries in diverse fields after Neil Armstrong

first

strode on the

moon

. With the passing time, populations tend to forget the scientific revolutions and their day to day activities eclipse the bigger picture of where our lives are leading to. I personally side with

this

phenomenon at large, and

this

essay will shed light on the valid points of why walking on the

moon

was not a breakthrough step for the common man. To commence with, strong advocates of

space

exploration believe that

this

achievement was a very major milestone in

this

domain and has opened new avenues for exploring life on different satellites and planets.

Nonetheless

,

this

being a huge success in

space

study, ordinary lives of humans have neither benefitted nor suffered due to it, which explains why mankind is least bothered about it. To give a clear example, masses might be more interested in registering for a guided tour of Mars

then

studying about the topology of Mars.

Therefore

, humans are mesmerized more by experiences than by reading about it which explains the contrast between the claim made by the astronomers and the actual difference

that is

created in the people's life. Emphasizing

further

on

this

, even though few decades have passed, there have not been revolutionary discoveries after

this

mission. With the advancements in technology, the paradigm has shifted from studying about the

moon

to demystifying other components of the solar system farther away from the

moon

.

For instance

, the recent

space

missions are focusing on getting in closer perimeters of mercury and sun, and

space

robotics come into play as humans cannot

survice

Correct your spelling

survive

service

such

climatic conditions.

Thus

,

this

demonstrates that setting feet on the

moon

was an extremely crucial stage for the

first

man to walk on the

moon

and his acquaintances, but its significance has diminished in the eyes of the public and the larger

space

community. To conclude, I recapitulate the aforementioned ideology that masses will value any innovation when they can directly experience or benefit out of it.

Although

the march on the

moon

is a notable win for astronomers and the

space

community, its advantages are not apparent and applicable to the broader world.