is one of the most precious natural
that people have. They have different views concerning whether the
should
the supply of it or not.
there is some truth in claiming that
should not
fresh
’s supply, I am inclined to believe that governments intervene in controlling
supply is important.
On the one hand, there are two principal reasons why some people believe that the
should not
the freshwater
.
and foremost, it is a renewable natural resource which existed since the Earth creature. To illustrate
, a recent study conducted by the American Environmental Reserve Association (AERA) in April 2019, which analyzed the
of 29 rivers and 100 lakes in different locations on the world, found that these
bodies renew their
every 50 years as they are renewing about 10% of their
every 10 years. As
shows, the proportion of
bodies not only are they stable in terms of their amounts, but they
renewable.
, regulating the provisions of
supply would not benefit the human being as
naturally preserve itself. Advocates of
approach are
keen to mention that enjoying the country’s natural
is a quintessential right of its citizens. They found controlling the
prevents them from/to enjoy their lives as
monitor their
usage. They suggest initiatives to raise individuals’ awareness about the overuse of
. Some of them mention the
bills in Egypt,
, contain a diagram to show Egyptian citizens their country’s consumption of
which motivates them to avoid
misuse.
, I found
thought is rather ill-founded since controlling
supply has a plethora of benefits.
, I would side with those who suppose that regulating freshwater supplies is crucial.
,
would benefit the environment. Sustaining the natural balance of the environment reflects positively on our life. Climate Change,
, affects most of our daily activities as it has a negative impact on many species which deteriorated their food chains and caused undesirable influences on human’s life. If we had done a number of measures in advance, we would have prevented
natural change consequences.
makes it clear that
should intervene to stop any irresponsible usage of
to save our habitat. An additional point is that
,Remove the comma
show examples
controlling
supply would probably help us to face any natural threats.
, as we are living in a changing world, natural threats might happen and we would need all of our
to tackle any potential problems.
, if the
plan its citizens' usage of
supply,
would save us.
To conclude, despite the existence of some favours against governmental
of freshwater supply due to
nature and their rights, I entirely support the idea of controlling
resource by the
because
has immediate benefits in sustaining the environment and our life.