Too much money is spent in maintaining and repairing old buildings, some people think they should be knocked down and give way to modem building. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Traditional

buildings

have their own importance. Some people opine that these should be demolished due to heavy maintenance costs whilst others have a contrasting viewpoint.

Although

these costs

are

huge, I completely disagree with

this

statement that these should be knocked down because old

buildings

are

cultural heritage and useful.

Firstly

, old

buildings

represent conventional architecture which represents culture. These

are

an attraction for tourists. Many travellers specially

visit

different countries to have a glimpse of these. These

are

the symbol of pride of nations.

For instance

, Taj Mahal of India is famous globally, millions of spectators

visit

India to see

this

. If these

are

demolished, tourists will not

visit

. Preserving the architecture of the old times is

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

national responsibility;

however

, these should not be knocked down.

Secondly

, these

are

useful in multiple ways. Governments can earn money through these. If a ticket price is imposed to

visit

these, a good amount can be earned.

Further

, these can be used for some purposes.

For instance

, an old building can be used as a college or university, an old palace is used as a college in India.

Hence

, in place of completely demolishing, these can be used as a college, library and garden. Building a completely new construction will be a waste of resources and money which is an unwise decision. In conclusion, old

buildings

are

national heritage and symbolic. These

are

beneficial for nations in a myriad of ways. I strongly disagree with

this

notion that these should be knocked down and modern building be constructed.