In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Folks gain
decent
Add an article
a decent
show examples
amount of wages in specific states and
this
is useful for the concerned area whilst the president should grab to create a restriction so that paid
money
would be distributed overall. From, my perspective, persons who get wealth after tasks, it should be conferred equally so that there is no discrimination. There are both advantages and disadvantages to
this
argument.
To begin
with, human survives themselves doing work. After, giving
a
Remove the article
apply
show examples
labour to their tasks they get the
money
. As a consequence, if he does more works he gains
the
Remove the article
apply
show examples
adequate
money
where he could be satisfied himself.
Thus
, receiving more economic substances, there would be no penance in his mind where he can be demotivated. Paying high salaries to employees will encourage him to create innovative ideas.
Finally
, constructing diversity in his thought, he would be eager to give a better output for the company.
For instance
, getting higher wages
a
Change the article
an
show examples
employer intends to do more works
especially
Add the comma(s)
,especially
show examples
he can concentrate on his overtime task.
On the other hand
, paid
money
should be divided equally. It is because some people do a lot of assignment but do not get the
money
comparing to doing his tasks. Poor persons are always deprived of their fundamental needs which they deserve from their government. Even, giving the economic substances in
a
Change the article
the
show examples
same amount would make people a responsible human where he can give a fruitful output for his country.
Thus
, it can
also
create a development for the state where a person can get the privilege at a certain time.
For example
, due to the political harassment or remaining bureaucracy in an
institution
Add a comma
,institution
show examples
there is a lack of chance of paid
money
for a qualified person. By distributing the wealth equally it is possible to create
a
Remove the article
apply
show examples
harmony in the country. In conclusion, huge salaries can motivate a person's mind for the welfare of the area.
However
, distribution not unequally can make a total improvement of the entire country which may be a huge fruitful issue for the nation people.
Submitted by Sadiq on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • wealth inequality
  • economic growth
  • motivation
  • talent acquisition
  • consumer spending
  • tax revenue
  • redistributing wealth
  • market forces
  • income disparity
  • social stability
  • freedom of choice
  • meritocracy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: