Nowadays, some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is suggested that there is no necessity to maintain public

museums

and art

galleries

because historical objects and artworks can be appreciated on the

Internet

. In my opinion,

although

Internet

Add an article

the Internet

show examples

has made it possible for us to browse masterpieces wherever we are, we should preserve

museums

and

galleries

. On the one hand, the

Internet

seems like a 24/7 museum and gallery. Whenever we get the pulse to enjoy wonderful art crafts, we can access them as long as the

Internet

store their images. With the development of virtual reality,

this

experience can be even more vivid.

Besides

, it is usually free to see exhibitions on the

Internet

, which benefits people in poverty. What is more, visitors can get rid of the crowd in

museums

and

galleries

in holidays, which ruins the experience.

On the other hand

,

museums

and

galleries

provide us with the perfect environment to admire cultural heritage and spiritual civilization. Under these circumstances, people might feel like talking to the creators of historical objects and artworks.

In addition

, for some brilliant works, only by seeing them in flesh, can we fully understand them because photographers may fail to capture the most stunning characteristics of them.

For example

, one may not be stunned by thousands of elegant pictures carved in the caves of Mogaoku if they do not enter the caves and

look up

Correct your spelling

lookup

show examples

carefully. In conclusion, no matter how advanced the

Internet

becomes, it only serves as another option to appreciate historical objects and artworks. Public

museums

and art

galleries

should always be kept.