in a number of countries,some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities.Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Public transports were always one of the hottest subjects of debates.
People
are divided in their opinion regarding whether to invest a huge amount of
money
on fast railway
lines
to connect
cities
, or to spend
this
money
on ameliorating the existing public
transport
. I do believe that
money
should be invested in the intracity public
transport
in lieu of intercities novel high-speed railway construction. According to
people
who advocate for building new fast-paced railways
lines
to connect
cities
, so many
people
work and live in different
cities
and have to spend long hours of commute to and from work. By building a fast
train
, we can make their life easier. On top of that, they are aiming for a new system
that is
flowless with better an up to date technology claiming that the old railways are usually not well maintained and can stop working anytime.
As a result
, it is necessary to invest
this
money
to improve cross
cities
transport
.
However
, it is very expensive to start building new fast
train
lines
.
For instance
, has been estimated that over 5 billion dollars are needed to build new fast
lines
to connect North to South BC.
This
money
can be spent on other parts like health care, social services, and to buy new buses.
Besides
, it takes years to build new
lines
due to unforeseen problems. Sometimes the problem can not be fixed and the project has to stop. For ,instance the project for a new fast
train
connecting Banff to Kamloops was stopped due to a big hole between two parts and experts could not find a solution on how to fix the problem.
Therefore
, big projects like building new inter-city connecting
lines
are time and
money
consuming and it is better to invest in what is already in place and improve it. As for me, I do believe that the number of
people
using in-city
transport
exceeds the number of those who travel in between
cities
.
Consequently
, it makes more sense to invest in our current public
transport
rather than starting a new project. It can be seen that, after years of using old buses, skytrains and seabus in Vancouver
for example
, we can easily replace them with the new ones. In fact,
this
minor change can happen quickly and help thousands of commuters.
Thus
, fixing public
transport
can help more
people
and is faster to implement it. To conclude, while some might disagree with me and believe that putting
money
into a new fast lane
train
that connects
cities
would be of greater importance than spending
money
to improve public
transport
, I strongly believe the opposite is more practical, cheaper, and will help more commuters.
Submitted by armiario139 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Answer the 'Advantages and Disadvantages' topic

IELTS advantages and disadvantages questions normally give you a statement and ask you to comment on the advantages and disadvantages of that statement.

Answer structure for the type of essay

  • Introduction
  • Body paragraph 1 – advantages
  • Body paragraph 2 – disadvantages
  • Conclusion

Examples to start your body paragraph:

  • The main advantage is...
  • The disadvantage of this...
  • The main benefit...
  • Despite these advantages...
  • One possible drawback...

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: