Undoubtedly, governments play a crucial role in maximizing the efficiency of the funds taxed by
citizens
. Some people look upon expenditures on Use synonyms
arts
as a waste of money and should be allocated to public Use synonyms
services
Use synonyms
instead
. As far as I am concerned, I strongly agree with the argument, and the reasons will be thoroughly explained as follows.
Linking Words
To begin
with, not all individuals are passionate about Linking Words
arts
, and Use synonyms
this
group of people will not benefit from the given policy. Linking Words
In other words
, the original intention of investing in Linking Words
arts
might not be as ideal as reality. Use synonyms
For example
, Linking Words
although
the Taiwanese government has spent a great amount of money on building museums displaying sculptures and paintings over the decades, I never Linking Words
visit
any of them Wrong verb form
visited
due to
lacking interest. Linking Words
However
, as a citizen, I still have to take the burden of the annual maintenance fees despite never receiving any advantage.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, it is widely accepted that public Linking Words
services
like health care or infrastructure can significantly enhance everyone's life of quality. Use synonyms
That is
to say, the government should prioritize funding public Linking Words
services
because it is a more comprehensive option to take care of their Use synonyms
citizens
. Use synonyms
For instance
, if the government puts more emphasis on road safety and reconstructs roads with uneven surfaces across the whole of the nation, all Linking Words
citizens
can benefit from it regardless of their ages or hobbies.
In conclusion, based on the aforementioned, investing in public Use synonyms
services
is much more meaningful compared to Use synonyms
arts
because the former successfully reaches all Use synonyms
citizens
and increases their life quality Use synonyms
greatly
.Rephrase
of life
a9572111067