it is more important for government to spend public funds on promoting a healthy lifestyle than treatment. do you agree of disagree?

Investing in primary prevention was always the ultimate goal of

governments

around the world. The idea of allocating

governments

'

money

into advocacy for a healthy lifestyle

instead

of treatment is advantageous. I totally agree with

this

statement because it will benefit the

government

financially. It has been estimated that over fifty per cent of the

government

's revenue is spent on health care annually to deal mostly with chronic diseases like diabetes, obesity and cardiac diseases. These medical conditions are the result of inactivity, which can be minimized by focusing on promoting healthy lifestyles for residents.

For example

, increasing the bike lanes and banning cars during rush hour to access

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

the city centre, can encourage the working population to bike to work

instead

of driving. Another action that the

government

can take is to build fitness facilities in different neighbourhoods for everyone to use.

Thus

by encouraging exercise we will have healthier people and less disease-related to lack of activity like obesity, diabetes, and other chronic conditions.

This

can save a lot of

money

that can be later invested in some other parts. The

second

aspect of a healthy lifestyle is a healthy diet. It has been claimed that

governments

'

money

can be saved by encouraging people to avoid eating junk food. An unhealthy diet can result in so many endless lists of health issues including hypertension and heart attack. Needless to say that the cost of dealing with those ailments puts the

government

into a huge financial burden.

This

problem can be tackled by advertising for a healthy diet and replacing fast-food restaurants with farm markets.If the

government

increase the tax on fast food products and make them unaffordable for low to moderate-income families, and decrease the cost of fresh produce on the other side, making them affordable for all, few people will aim to buy unhealthy foods. To conclude, I totally agree with the notion of the

government

promoting a healthy way of living for residents rather than spending

money

on treatment. Due to the fact that over fifty per cent of the

governments

'

money

goes into the health care system.

Instead

of paying to cure diseases, they can invest in a healthy lifestyle like expanding bike lanes and working on reducing the cost of healthy foods to have a healthier population.