The best way to solve the world‘s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is irrefutable that, rise in environmental pollution become a hot topic to discuss. Some ethnic group are with the verdict that the government should raise the charge of smoke like petrol and diesel.

This

issue is quite controversial, but I am partially agreeing with

this

statement. In my essay, I intend the delve into the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches. On one hand, motor vehicle exhaust waste plays a major role in creating climate pollution. People who intended to buy the motor vehicle would ruminate them at least once,

moreover

, individuals would really deliberate going unnecessarily out into their vehicles, according to the ministry of transport survey in India, after increasing the ammunition value had turned into 40 per cent less traffic than usual in

last

year.

However

, increasing the price of vapour would control the world’s habitat to some extent.

On the other hand

, those who have strata position in the society would still have the personal vehicle of their own.

Instead

of creating the surroundings cleaner, the sales of automobiles would be divesting and have a large impact on the economy of the nation. As

such

, the growing automobiles industry holds almost 30 per cent shares of the wealth of any nation. there is no meaning in increasing vapour figure to the affluent of society and their economy. We all know that forbidden fruits are always sweater and rising the vapour amount would not be an efficient method to control the ongoing scenario of the world’s habitat.

Instead

of that, the government should articulate the concern and influence the automobiles industries to manufacture the solar-vehicles or electrical vehicles to support the ecosystem.