Serious violent crimes among people who are under-18 are becoming more common. Some people think that children who commit serious crimes should be treated like adults, while others would say that they should be rehabilitated.

Major violent offences are being carried out by children more often. While some would argue that they should get the same treatments as grown-ups, I believe they should be treated differently and rehabilitation is a better option. On the one hand, treating young violent criminals like they are over-18 gives the victims justice. Someone who has lost a loved one would find it very difficult if the perpetrator was not sentenced to prison because they are not old enough. Their relative is still dead or injured no matter how old the criminal is.
For example
, the mother of Jamie Bulger said that it was like the crime happening all over again when she heard her son's murderers were released earlier than expected because they committed the crime when they were only 11 years old.
However
, I believe that a criminal's age should be taken into consideration because they are not fully developed as human beings.
On the other hand
, it is thought that children who carry out violence are not aware of their actions because of their age. A young child does not know, to the same degree as adults, that their violent actions will result in death or serious injury.
This
is why young murderers in the United Kingdom are rehabilitated and give new identities so that they can live a normal adult life outside of prison. I believe
this
school of thought is preferable because it helps the young criminal reform and ensures that they do not carry out serious crimes again. In conclusion,
although
sending young criminals who have committed violent atrocities to adult prisons gives the victims some justice, the criminals themselves should
also
be seen as victims, because they were not aware of their actions and
that is
why trying to make them model citizens again is a more preferable option.
Submitted by haidher301 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: