Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

There is an endless debate between individuals who suggest that hosting an international sports event is efficient for the

country

, while others define

this

idea as a negative influence on the

country

. I will discuss both views and give my own opinion on

this

topic. On the one hand, organizing global sports events is a sufficient way to attract more investors and tourists. The countries with poorly developed infrastructure and economy are in desperate need to receive some financing from any available sources.

Consequently

,

such

affairs facilitate the possibility of attracting customers to that

country

.

Moreover

, hosting

such

an affair gives people a place to work, even if it is temporary.

For example

, countries like Brazil, South Korea and etc., engaged in

such

matters and tackled problems like inflation, unemployment and low - quality tourism.

On the other hand

, erecting buildings or stadiums for

such

meetings is an enormous expense from the

country

's budget. Some societies do not have enough funds to support them.

This

leads to the deficiency of the state's budget and the government will have to take international debts. Meanwhile, the sectors like education, healthcare, defence, and public goods will suffer from the lack of financing from the budget, as all of the money will go to the coverage of the credit.

For instance

, Kazakhstan suffered from a decrease in salaries, scholarships, and pensions during the construction of one of those sports ceremonies. In conclusion,

this

situation requires deep research on the experience of other countries that hosted

such

events.

Personally

Add a comma

,Personally

show examples

I see more advantages rather than negative sides, as building and generating facilities to host those affairs increases the number of consumers and entrepreneurs.