Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should been encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc. to serve society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Few of the masses believe that toppers should be rewarded by Universities while others claim that students who are improving are crucial to reward.

This

essay will analyse both perspectives and explain why I support the former view. On the one hand, those who hold the thought that award should be given to high scorer advocates that

this

system not only raise their prestige but

also

motivates them to study harder.

In other words

, if an individual’s hard work is not praised

then

, he/she may not be able to focus on his/her academic year.

For example

, a recent government survey in our country has demonstrated that ninety per-cent of rewarded undergraduate are successful in their life.

Therefore

, the government should focus on

such

provision to maintain their standards.

On the other hand

, people who oppose

this

view feel that more priority should be given to improving graduate which means that they should be rewarded. But,

this

can demotivate the scholar who is achieving the best academic result.

For instance

, a recent study of a media channel , NTV has revealed that the topper’s rank is decreasing where developing pupil are praised.

Thus

, the government should apply

such

a method by which everyone will be encouraged to try harder to get success. Taking everything into consideration, it is clear that high-rank student can gain the prestige that encourages them;

however

, a rewarding graduate who is improving can discourage high rankers.

Therefore

, I wholeheartedly believe that the best scholar should be awarded to raise their standard as well as encourage for a successful professional carrier.