Recently, tourism has encouraged humans around the world to agree on
international
for communication. English has become the most prominent
in the world, whereas some people reject
idea because they claim that
would lead to the destruction of many societies. In
essay, I will discuss the benefits and possible drawbacks of using a common international
globally.
On
hand, choosing a common dialect to be used in communication among global citizens has various benefits. The
is the financial impact of
linguistic feature on many countries.
appears in the ability to expand the international market to include all countries, giving a chance for poor ones to develop economically by exchanging goods and economic experiences with other nations. Japanese developed industries,
, would be able to communicate with African organizations to exchange highly technological experience with labour or natural resources.
exchange between communities does not only support them financially but
culturally through tourism
,Remove the comma
show examples
since different nationalities are able to exchange history, customs and traditions for a better understanding among human beings.
cultural interaction could lead to resistance to global wars and conflicts.
, having
would make the world a small village where there are peace and innovation.
, using a typical voice among humans could lead to drastic drawbacks.
of these disadvantages is the disappearance of many languages which are used by minorities.
, Kurdish and Yagan will be substituted by English because of their rare usage.
linguistic feature would make many cultures endangered because
is the carrier of history and literature, which are the mirror of societies. These cultural consequences will lead to the loss of identities and alienation of future generations in many ethnic societies. That might restrict many nations from developing to compete with developed countries. In a word, a myriad of nations' cultural and ethnic identities can be destroyed and replaced by the fragmented multi-ethnic identity
led by English native speakers.
In conclusion, I believe that having a single communicative linguistic feature is pivotal to the survival of people on the planet, but
should be restricted in some sectors of human interaction to overcome its drawbacks. While
could bring people together for a better standard of living and a prevalence of peace, it is necessary to protect indigenous languages that protect the human race's characteristics of diversity and identity.