In your opinion, which is a better to prevent graffiti vandalism - to punish those who damage the buildings or to organise official street art graffiti festivals?

There is currently a contentious argument over whether

graffiti

could be considered a type of

art

instead

of vandalism. I totally agree with

this

opinion because it is a human right to express their own

ideas

in whichever way they wish, and people can learn from

this

art

and be inspired by it. The main reason why I believe individuals who do

graffiti

can be considered artists is because everyone has the right to express

ideas

and communicate concepts.

This

is due to the fact that usually,

this

kind of

art

has an intention to protest something or even to express some feeling. As well as

this

,

graffiti

artists are used to spreading their

ideas

through

art

and often exhibit their work in places with many people moving. To illustrate, we can compare with other types of

art

, like music, pictures, and movies. The main goal of any

art

is to disseminate a thought to someone who likes it. Another reason why I support that

graffiti

should not be considered

a

Remove the article

apply

show examples

vandalism is that everyone has learnt something through it, get inspired and even just enjoy a moment after seeing

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

graffiti

.

This

is because nowadays we have a busy routine and sometimes when we came across some

art

,

for example

on the way to work, we feel better and inspired. In conclusion, I completely agree that

graffiti

is a type of

art

because it is a way to express

ideas

and expose sentiment and individuals can learn from

art

and be inspired. Given

this

situation, it seems that the government should encourage

graffiti

artists because it is a part of our culture.