It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a view that the authority pours much money into protecting

wildlife

. In my opinion, the government could allocate their budget to other important sectors.

Firstly

, it is vital that education should be invested in difficult areas in the developing country.

This

is because the children living in disadvantaged places are hard to reach

to

Change preposition

apply

show examples

schools, especially ethnic minority students,

thus

the rate of illiteracy has risen dramatically over the years. The government should offer free learning programs to them to have a better chance of attending schools that

also

offer students raise awareness about protecting

wildlife

in the long run.

Conversely

, if children are not educated, they will not have sufficient knowledge about

wildlife

conservation, even they can kill or harm innocent animals. I believe that issues of life

pollution

affect both humans and

wildlife

. If the officials increase their spending on it, it will be more fruitful for both.

For example

, people cut down the trees to expand the land, infrastructure facilities and factories were built by deforestation could threaten the

wildlife

habitat, even lead to the extinction of some species.

Furthermore

, cities are facing air

pollution

because of increasing traffic and population. So the government should focus more on

pollution

rather than

wildlife

. In conclusion, it is my firm belief that the state should spend more money on improving education and reducing

pollution

rather than

wildlife

. At the same time, protecting

wildlife

habitat could be enhanced in the future.