Governments should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that countries should allocate more funds to

education

than to leisure and competitive games. It is agreed that national budgets should prioritise schools and universities over sports and play.

First

, I will discuss the economic prosperity that

education

can bring to a nation and

secondly

, the social welfare it has. Investment in its

education

system is one of the best ways to improve a country’s economy in the long term. The more students entering

third

-level

education

, the more skilled a workforce will be and

this

leads to higher innovation and productivity.

For example

, South Korea and Finland took the decision to invest a large proportion of their budget in schooling and

this

has reaped benefits in the form of high-tech companies

such

as Samsung and Nokia. So,

education

is a powerful tool for the development of the nation.

Education

is not just about improving the economy it

also

has many social benefits. Well educated people tend to be more aware of social evils

such

as drugs, alcohol and sexual health.

For example

, Singapore educates all of its citizens on the dangers of drugs and

this

has resulted in one of the lowest levels of drug abuse in the world.

Therefore

investing in

education

is helpful to teach children valuable soft skills,

such

as teamwork and work ethic which highly helps curb social ills. In conclusion,

education

should take precedence over sports when it comes to funding due to the many socio-economic benefits it brings. It is recommended that governments continue to pump money into schools and universities in order to realise long-term goals.