Topic: In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree? disagree?

In

this

Linking Words

technology-driven world, people are more self-dependent.

Hence

Linking Words

use of living organisms for the purposes of diet, attire and cure is not very crucial. I agree with

this

Linking Words

notion completely. In the upcoming paragraphs, I will put forth my views in detail.

To begin

Linking Words

with, in

this

Linking Words

modern era, humanity has enough methods to replace living fauna completely to fulfil their needs. To elaborate, nowadays, synthetic materials are available for food, garment manufacture and to prepare safe and superior medicines.

For example

Linking Words

, a survey conducted by a reputed newspaper in the US shows that 35% of people who included synthetic meat in their diet are found to be healthy and disease resistant.

Thus

Linking Words

it could be said that animals could be completely replaced by superior commodities safely.

In addition

Linking Words

,

such

Linking Words

replacements are helpful to protect endangered animals from extinction. To explain, due to indiscriminate human intervention on biodiversity millions of organisms are on the verge of mass extinction.

Therefore

Linking Words

finding alternative ways to accomplish human requirements assisted in saving nature to a large extent.

For instance

Linking Words

, with regard to study conducted by the environmental committee shown that India for the past few years due to the increased use of artificial substances in industries have given a ray of hope for biodiversity to survive. Having analyzed the above details it is apparent that switching over to alternative modes rather than animal exploitation is mandatory. To conclude, with the advancements in technology, the use of living organisms for human needs would be reduced and they could be effectively replaced with more effective man-made commodities.