Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. Do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that people who had criminal record previously should not be given because it can help to protect those defendants, while some attorneys believe that the past information of
criminals
needs to be released before making
case
decisions. In my perspective, I partly agree with
this
statement, as I think the past facts of
offenders
whether should be given depends on the situation of the
case
.
Firstly
, prohibit to access
criminals
previous criminal
records
would affect the decision of the
case
. Without understand the defendant's criminal histories, lawyers and judges may unable to make a fair decision.
This
means that legal officers may assign lesser chargers if they do not know the
offenders
are habitual
criminals
. As a consequence, those
criminals
may commit crime again after being released, as they are not severely fined.
However
, it is sometimes not fair to
offenders
if disclosing all the past facts of them, as some lawyers may make a rash decision based on
criminals
previous unfavourable
records
instead
of doing detailed investigations. Some
offenders
may committed crimes at their young age or cheated by others, and they had been punished
accordingly
. In
this
situation, these criminal
records
should not be considered as a reference to the current criminal
case
, as they committed crimes due to they were immature and innocent.
For example
, if a criminal made an offence at his teenage age, and
this
person committed a crime again when he is 30 years old,
then
legal officers should not take his previous criminal record into an account. In conclusion, despite the fact that disclosing a
offenders
' past criminal record may help lawyers and judges understand the
criminals
' background, while I think the information should be given according to the situations as some criminal
records
should not be taken into consideration.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users