Some people believe that teenager should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time . This can be benefit teenagers and the community as well . To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the ultramodern epoch, it is a point of debate that the group of teenagers should help poor

people

who have not money or things to live in life. Undoubtedly,

this

notion remains successful in keeping the majority in its favour. The upcoming paragraphs would cast light on my argument related to very conception. I wholeheartedly concur with the statement that those

people

who belong from 13 to 18 should do something for the

community

.

This

myriad reason in favour of my argument, intelligent pupils should help to children those have to not house for living and they are lived in footpath side of the road. They have not money to eating to food

then

how they start their

study

in school. Pupils should help them in the

study

for unpaid because if they will educate they can achieve some good jobs and

this

effect is

also

a good impact on the country's economy. To add a few more reason, how can one forget about? there is some who

also

have conned

this

. To justify the some, there is the epitome of if juvenile doing unpaid work in the

community

they will face some problem. They are

also

a student and they have not a lot of time. If they will go help the

community

they can lose of

study

. Apart from all,

this

they will disappoint the

people

who are

also

working for the

community

. And they will see the

people

who cannot get a job from the Government and in good company. Even they are well educated and have a high degree from the university.

This

is definitely a bad impact on student. They will distract from their

study

. On a final note, I am of the opinion there are different pros and cons about help to the

community

as there is not any plausible argument against the very phenomenon.