Countries should produce the food that their population eats, and import as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Import should be avoided wherever possible, and every country should be self-sufficient with regard to the quantity of
food
produced. There are several reasons why I believe
this
should be done. The most important reason is that by eating locally,
food
transport is not needed,
thus
, less petrol is consumed and in turn, the rate of air pollution is significantly reduced. Less pollution means fewer cases of respiratory diseases
such
as asthma and bronchitis and an overall increased sense of well being. Another reason why I am in favour of
this
idea is that by not having to add the shipping cost, the
food
would be much cheaper. Some products nowadays are imported from countries that are tens of thousands of miles away.
For instance
, China coupled with its recent economic boom has started to import Brazilian beef, the distance between China and Brazil is about ten thousand miles. With a simple calculation, it is easy to understand that an important sum could be saved if the Chinese remained to their previous
food
tastes. A final reason is the quality of the
food
. Local produce tends to be of higher quality,
therefore
, tastes better. Crops are sometimes harvested before they ripen.
This
causes a lack of nutrients in the crops because,
since
Change preposition
apply
show examples
the moment the crop is cut from the rest of the plant, it does not receive nutrients anymore.
This
means that a vine of tomatoes,
for example
, can ripen while being transported so that they are ripe while in the sale, which is great for business. In conclusion, I strongly support the idea of countries trying as much as possible to eat only the
food
produced by themselves as
this
would reduce air pollution and would ensure the
food
is cheaper and tastier, compared to imported one.
Submitted by alinmuresan.c on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • self-sufficiency
  • trade dependency
  • food security
  • sustainable agriculture
  • local economies
  • carbon footprint
  • supply chain
  • food miles
  • agricultural sector
  • domestic production
  • import substitution
  • food sovereignty
  • global supply chains
  • trade imbalances
  • food standards
  • economic resilience
  • biodiversity
  • cultural heritage
What to do next:
Look at other essays: