Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer techology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is sometimes argued that, with the introduction of
computers
, the authorities should not waste money on the maintenance of public
libraries
. While
this
could be the case for several reasons, my view is that traditional
libraries
have an important function that
computers
cannot perform and
therefore
should be maintained for public access. To a certain extent, computer technology can render
libraries
unimportant. Indeed, physical
libraries
provide readers with paper books or DVDs,
for example
, in limited numbers at certain times of the day, while an Internet-connected computer can bring even a limitless supply of digital-based information that can be accessed 24/7. There is
also
less effort involved in searching for digitalised information in a website or an e-book than in a large library. Based on the evidence above, virtual reading resources certainly provide a much more convenient user experience compared to their conventional counterpart.
However
, in my view, there are certain roles of traditional
libraries
that
computers
cannot take over,
therefore
they should be kept publicly accessible.
Firstly
, in a physical library, it is not difficult to find comfortable and quiet spaces to enjoy reading a book.
This
is highly beneficial, given the increasing number of sources of noise surrounding us these days.
Secondly
, library users have access to more reliable sources of information. A great deal of online content we have today, meanwhile, is not censored, which possibly leads to a misinformed public. In conclusion,
although
computers
to a certain extent can replace traditional
libraries
in maintaining a well-informed society, I believe in the future
libraries
can be both online and offline to optimize their use.
Submitted by doannguyenhadan on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: