Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

While many individuals think that there should be a standardization of

sentences

for each

crime

, others argue that every

crime

should be discussed in their specific scenario with the

motivation

behind the reason,

therefore

the

punishment

should be given differently. In my opinion,

although

fixed

punishment

can be a viable solution for corruption and bribery, the

motivation

for committing a

crime

should be considered in order to make an accurate judgment. The aim of

this

essay is to discuss the debate with the merits and the demerits. On the one hand, fixed

sentences

can be a beneficial resolution to solve the problem of corruption and bribery. By doing

this

, an equal

decision

can be taken by the courts and judges due to the fairness of the stable

punishment

.

Furthermore

, the fixed

sentences

have the potential to solve the over-familiarity problem in ,especially rural areas.

For instance

, plenty of people have been judged unfairly in Turkey and the court took the side of the offender in many cases owing to over-familiarity.

Consequently

, fixed punishments can minimize the scope of the court about their

decision

however

, it can be a key to solve problematic issues

such

as bribery, corruption and over-familiarity.

On the other hand

, it is important to bear in mind that the wrong

decision

can be made by the authorities. In

this

way, innocent people can be judged unfairly.

For example

, many people have been sentenced to life imprisonment in the USA and there are some wrong decisions that can be observed.

Thus

, it can cost a life of a person.

Moreover

, as an advantageous point, the reason behind the

crime

can change in each circumstance. To illustrate that killing a person without reason should not equal to killing a person for defending purposes should not be taken in the same way.

Hence

, there are some unfair judgments in some cases

nevertheless

, the

motivation

for committing may change and the

punishment

should be considered from every angle. To summarize, some individuals claim that the fixed

punishment

should be considered for each

crime

. Others discuss that the

motivation

for committing a

crime

should be taken to account before deciding.

This

essay demonstrated that

although

fixed

sentences

can be a resolution for some problematic issue, there are various reasons for committing a

crime

and they should be taken into account in order to make a

decision

correctly.