Some systems require students to specialize in a limited range of subjects from the age of fifteen. Other systems require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of these two education systems and which is better?

Nowadays, there are different government systems that country per country decide what is the best education for their students. In fact, some countries force their scholar to specialize them in a limited range of

subjects

, especially from the age of fifteen, to prepare their youngster for a "world of the job".

On the contrary

, some nations prefer another type of education: they require students to study a wide range of

subjects

until they leave

school

. In

this

essay, I will discuss the benefits of both views, and

finally

, I would state my own opinion regarding the matter. On the one hand, public authorities want to teach their scholars the main

subjects

and sectors they need to learn to increase their possibility of work. In fact, government nations, usually invest in

this

type of

school

system to specialize their undergraduates and it represents a strategy to fight against unemployment.

For example

, in China's countryside, the unemployment rates declined significantly, and it is an enormous benefit that started from their

school

methods.

On the other hand

, ministers that prefer to educate students to study some

subjects

obtained benefits. In fact, it is known that if undergraduates could learn some

subjects

in their high

school

experience, it could enhance their minds and mentality.

Thus

, they

also

could go up to their cultural knowledge.

Moreover

, another important advantage is that they could passionate about one of these

subjects

. To conclude, every education systems have their key power, but I personally think that it is important that every individual should know many aspects of our world because it could improve their personality and above all their culture for their future.