In
modern world, few countries
have opined about
that it could be vital to invest huge amount on developing tremendously high-speed trains within the city and others believe,
must be invested on upgrading old public
. In my opinion, both public
and trains have their own benefits but railways are eco-friendly and
cost effectiveAdd a hyphen
show examples
.
essay will substantiate both views in the following paragraph with relevant examples.
There are numerous reasons that putting
on constructing rapid
within the cities will help the nation to an economic boom.
, railways are eco-friendly and because of
we able to cope up with pollution.
, if the regime of the country will look into expanding
inside the city will help
to save
on travelling as we all know as compared to other
facility subways are more affordable and it is
beneficial for travel to short journey. Take an example of,
. The survey conducted by
governmentAdd an article
show examples
of
indiaChange the capitalization
show examples
in 2019 that with a year of lunch of the
, masses travelled excessively.
, the result was shocking they predicted,
begginingCorrect article usage
show examples
of six
monthChange to a plural noun
show examples
of the
only 50% masses would travel but it turns out 80%
peopleChange preposition
show examples
travelled by
. Metros are safe, extremely rapid and good in the frequency because of
would love to travel by tube and
it is not deniable that, monorails are more
budget friendlyAdd a hyphen
show examples
.
On the
hand, some
argued about
spendAdd the particle
show examples
extra
on existing public
. It is not neglectable that public
areChange the verb form
show examples
good for
for short journeys and it is more frequently available but it charged
toReplace the word
show examples
much. If the
of the country would
thoughtChange the verb form
show examples
about upgrading public
thanCorrect your spelling
show examples
not only
have to face
jam issue but
, they have to deal with massive air pollution problems.
, the other side of public
is it would be more costly as compared to all the aspects
as
,Remove the comma
show examples
petrol, gas, tax you name it, every necessary thing will increasing in rates.
, by improving public
we might have
faceChange the verb form
show examples
extreme difficulties.
To conclude, considering above mentioned point it is evident that, eco-friendly travel is always better for any nation. In my opinion, the government must spend
on constructing
in cities that will improve the growth of
economyAdd an article
show examples
of the country and would not bring any pollution and traffic problems.