Some people think that old buildings should be nocked down and give way to the new buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree

In general, every property has its own lifespan and value. New

buildings

need to replace the old ones for developing the surrounding in order to suit

people

's generations and lifestyles

although

maintaining old constructions is another choice of cultural's conservation.  It cannot be denied that

buildings

must change while becoming dilapidated. It is an acceptable and understandable decision but some new

buildings

are constructed for nothing.

Similarly

, if

people

destroy all of the ancient constructions, the old traditions Trent to die respectively. Even if some of them may be located in the improper area, it is not better if

people

just shift or adjust them,

consequently

they still have a modern city with a unique attraction. 

However

, old constructions are important archaeological or architectural values, it might be integral to the culture and be a symbol of a city or

country

. Demolition of

such

building may cause serious damages to cultural and traditional institutions.

Therefore

, the population needs to remain and maintain

this

traditional construction of

people

in a

further

decade.

Moreover

, these kinds of the building can be referred to the ancestors of

people

in each

country

.

In addition

, ancient

buildings

are the best attraction for either domestic tourists and foreign tourists which might generate an income for the

country

. In conclusion, even though ancient

buildings

are old and unusable, they are uniqueness thing of each city or

country

, they are the other main source of income for their particular area. In my opinion,

people

should proud and conserve these

buildings

not only for their children but

also

for their society.