Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic? What are the benefits and disadvantages of this?

It is true more and more travellers, nowadays, are exploring

places

where to have extreme

conditions

.

Although

travelling in

such

pretty hostile areas has positive aspects

such

as exhilarating

besides

turning an inhabitable place into a residence, there is a negative side for

tourists

. Having a marvellous experience for those who make a journey to a pretty hostile region would have benefits. Needless to say,

such

adventures would confront unprecedented

places

making them confident. Travelling on the remote mountains leads to exploring worthwhile ancient caves,

for example

, so it is an advantage for a traveller. But, the bulk of the journey might be looking out the inhabitable region and

then

turning it into a tourist’s attraction plot where a new society can be

also

flourished. Meanwhile, the sightseer can release endorphin and

thus

escape from the stress that comes from hustling and bustling. So, where could be better than a remote tranquil area covering snow with rays of sunshine in polar? Certainly,

tourists

have a sense of fulfilment and excitement in visiting

such

areas.

However

, at the same time, suffering from natural

conditions

seems to be a disadvantage.

Tourists

probably deal with the scarcity of water in Sahara deserts or freezing cold in the Antarctic where their physical health is at risk.

Besides

this

, wildlife in extreme

conditions

makes

this

region frightful and dangerous.

For example

, toxic snakes and polar bears habituating there can attack and injure

tourists

. In conclusion, exploring

places

where are pretty hostile could be an exciting experience along with giving an opportunity to build a life in inhabitable

places

,

however

, threats that come from wildlife and extreme

conditions

is a drawback and can not be relinquished.