In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this?

Some people are against building

homes

in the

countryside

.

However

, there is a lack of space in many places to construct new

homes

, as a human initial requirement, and

thus

using the

countryside

is unavoidable. I do think had been there a plan,

homes

would be built without any damages to

such

areas. The

countryside

is considered an unspoiled area that should be protected. But, is

this

open field will be used for a timber factory,

for example

, or for a human necessity? Having a home is the initial materialistic desire of a person and

therefore

building a home is crucial. At the same time, every day many people emigrate from rural regions to urban for many reasons

such

as finding a job.

Consequently

, the need of need new

homes

is becoming more and more. Needless to say, the nature of the

countryside

should conserve appropriately, yet, construction can be conducted in the right way by the government to meet people desire. Government can make a contract with architectures entitled ‘the

countryside

-friendly construction regulations’. In

this

way,

initially

, if constructors used derelict buildings and cottages, the

countryside

would not fall into ruin. To illustrate, rebuilding, repairing and redecorating old infrastructures is the

first

target.

Besides

this

, equally practical, finding the best location for a residence, a path with less plant fauna or far from historical assets,

for instance

, could avoid destroying

such

areas. In conclusion, I would reaffirm my opinion that building new

homes

in the

countryside

is certainly needed.

However

, there are some concerns about protecting areas from damage and so a plan should be designed by the government to avoid the harmful effects of construction.