Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Whether a

police

officer

should carry a pistol or not is debatable.A few people ponder that if a policeman carries guns

then

it might lead to more violence. I firmly dissent with

this

notion and will explain my standpoint in the upcoming paragraphs. To commence with, the fundamental reason why an

officer

should carry a weapon is that they are professionally trained to use a gun so it will not lead to violence.To elaborate, an

officer

will only take out a pistol in adverse circumstances where the life of citizens is in danger.

For example

, recent news published by the Times of India illustrated that a policeman was able to protect the employees at the bank robbery because he immediately used his revolver to distract and shoot the robbers on site.

Therefore

, a self-defence weapon is required to be carried by

police

personnel for people's safety. Another point to consider is that a weapon can be useful to maintain discipline in society.

In other words

, some criminals are highly proficient in fighting skills

hence

they can overpower the

police

officer

so in these situations a handgun can be helpful to bring out fear in the minds of the offenders.

For instance

, BBC news reported an incident where a group of fighters got into a quarrel and started hitting each other, a policeman was able to tackle

this

situation by taking out the pistol and arresting them all.

Thus

, a gun can be a useful asset for an

officer

to wisely handle situations without violence. To conclude from the aforementioned arguments, I would like to infer that a

police

officer

needs to carry a handgun in order to maintain decorum in society, and

also

protect the life of the citizens at risk during life-threatening circumstances

such

as robberies and gun fires by lawbreakers.