Some people believe that children should be allowed to choose what subjects they study at school. Others argue that everyone should study the same subjects. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Although

it is sometimes argued pupils should study the same

subjects

, it seems to me each child older than 12 have can decide what to study. Both sides will be explored in

this

essay. On the one hand, it is claimed that passing core

subjects

play a pivotal role in children's personal and professional lives in the

future

. Indeed, people would not find a suitable career and meet their day-to-day needs,

such

as shopping and paying the bills, if they had not studied mathematics and literature. Having a certain amount of knowledge about these fundamentals cannot be optional since many juveniles may not understand their importance.

As a result

, younger pupils who are not mature enough should not choose whatever they wish to study.

On the other hand

, allowing school-age children older than 12 to choose among

subjects

allows them to find fields they interested in or talented in. They can focus on these

subjects

and cultivate their talents and interests, enhancing their employability in the

future

.

For example

, one may find playing the piano as his talent, and he can nurture it to become a successful musician in the

future

. The ability to choose between different

subjects

also

results in improved decision-making skill which can make children confident.

Thus

, teenagers older than 12 can follow the

subjects

since they are smart enough to distinguish the right for themselves. In conclusion, I think those younger than 12 should learn core

subjects

because they must meet their

future

needs.

However

, teenagers older than 12 should have the ability to focus on what they are interested in or talented in.