It is argued that in the coming years, the population would use the Internet to read newspapers and books rather than buying the printed materials.
This
essay completely agrees with the statement because soft copies of newspapers and magazines are convenient to use and prevent deforestation to some extent.
Linking Words
Firstly
, papers are heavier when in bundles and difficult to use while travelling, and they are space-consuming. The soft copies of books and newspapers can be read on multiple devices and can be used by their preferences. Linking Words
Moreover
, people could read any materials published anywhere in the world, which would be difficult to get in the print style. Linking Words
For example
, some folk in India read the Guardian, the Times, etc in e-paper format, which wouldn’t have been possible if they had to depend on the hard copies. So, in the future community would be using online media to read than the printed media for their convenience.
Linking Words
Secondly
, a lot of trees are being cut to make paper, and using the digital pattern would prevent the cutting of the woods. Linking Words
Furthermore
, once someone finishes reading the online style of the books, it can be deleted, whereas the papers would stay in the environment and would cause pollution even if it is recycled. Linking Words
For instance
, an article in India Today showed, most of the trees and bamboos were cut in the Linking Words
last
decade for making paper. Linking Words
Therefore
, people in the future would use less paper to protect nature.
To conclude, I completely support the use of the Internet for reading than printed forms, as it helps to prevent the clearing of the woodlands and is very useful to read any materials published on the planet, as well as could be used anywhere anytime.Linking Words
jomontjacob23