It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

People
might reach
places
that are deserted in order to observe and research them. In my opinion,
this
fact brings more drawbacks for nature compared to any possible advantages for humankind. Admittedly, there are some basic benefits of travelling to remote areas.
First
, tourists can broaden their minds and find a lot of stunning information about untouched nature.
For example
, the bravest and curious
people
often take a tour, or they travel alone to distant locations due to their desire to know more.
Second
,
such
places
may reveal to us tons of scientific facts about what was unknown before.
Furthermore
, it is well known that humans are interested in everything new, and they try to explain our existence all the time throughout history.
Thus
, exploring is in
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
people
's nature.
Nevertheless
, despite the advantages above, I believe that it can harm the environmental conditions on our planet. One potentially dangerous problem is that any interference in the natural process will destroy its basic conditions and they will never be the same as at the beginning.
For instance
, there is a scientifically proved fact that every time when humankind discovers a new land, it leads to the destruction and distinction of animal species and rare plants. Another obvious issue is using fuel in order to reach those
places
.
As a result
, the level of air and water contamination in the unspoiled areas will significantly increase. In conclusion, preserving remote areas far outweigh any minor benefits that visiting
such
places
could bring to
people
.
Submitted by alina.rud88 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: