technology provides us a lot of means to communicate. but now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods, our communication and social abilities have taken a step back. why does technological advance hurt nontechnical communication? how can we solve this problem?

As humanity advances towards modern technology, the use of different sources for communication is
also
increased in abundance. These sources somehow decreased the gathering of peoples and non-relevant talking as well. A variety of platforms are available currently, which provide a wide range of functions to interpret every feeling and every situation of mankind
Moreover
people can post their pictures, quotes, suggestions as well on these platforms which will get automatically shared with their friends and followers. Adding more on its features the communities, the government, the banks can
also
share the important information relevant to their organisation. Every application has its own way of interpretation and conversation which attracts people toward them.
This
has increased their social skills along with the time consumed by
this
application.
This
way of communication like one-on-one meet between mankind has been decreased drastically.
Firstly
, when there is no platform to serve the purpose of social connection everyone arranges to meet their beloved and connect with them on regular basis, but now
this
scenario has completely changed. To change the scenario of the social meet, awareness about its fallbacks needs to be spread. Including more on that society has to see lousy points of it like How it creates a barrier on the improvement of interpersonal skill.
Moreover
, nowadays neighbours who are living just one block away text each other for any work, children refer to send a WhatsApp rather than go and meet personally. To change these situations one must avoid using these platforms for these purposes. Interpersonal interaction must need to be increased. In conclusion, society has to limit the use of these applications and has to make themselves aware of its drawback. They have to remember face-to-face communication is the best way of communicating.
Submitted by Dhrumil Vaghela on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
What to do next:
Look at other essays: