It is impossible to help all people around the world in need so governments should focus on people from their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that Governments should put an emphasis on helping their own citizens because of the inability to help all the

world

population

. While I admit that there are some drawbacks, I mostly agree with

this

statement.

First

of all, it is true that not all

countries

have the power to supply the needs of their

population

.

Therefore

, aids from the rest of the

world

can play a significant role in developing poorer

countries

.

For example

, the financial aids that

countries

have been sending to Africa for more than 40 years increased the life expectancy, overall wealth, education level, and

also

played an important role in fighting serious disasters, reducing hunger in those

countries

.

On the other hand

, if all

countries

focus on their national issues and try to solve them properly, there would be no problem at all. It is the citizens’ money which governments use to help other

countries

, so

instead

of helping them, the money should be allocated among the ones who own it. Another reason is that sometimes government officials make some aids around the

world

which are actually in need for its own

population

.

For example

, in Turkey, the government decided to send more than 1 million vaccines to poor

countries

,

in

Change preposition

apply

show examples

result the vaccination process in Turkey delayed thereby affecting everybody because of the restrictions In conclusion, I would like to tell that even though there are some people around the

world

who needs help, I believe governments should prioritize assisting their own

population

instead

of others.