Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There are some individuals thinking if those
people
who live in the
countryside
immigrate to the heart of towns, traffic congestion and
transportation
issues will be improved. In
this
regard, some more viable solutions can be provided
instead
of encouraging
people
to immigrate to metropolises. From my point of view, persuading
people
to live in city centres cannot be considered as a practical measure to amend public
transportation
problems. In my view, if the government develops roads which connect
cities
to
suburbs
, it can ease public
transportation
, certainly.
Furthermore
, developing subway
transportation
also
will improve traffic jams and help
people
move faster and safer.
Moreover
, providing more occupation opportunities in
suburbs
will prevent the daily immigration of
people
who live in the
countryside
;
in other words
, those individuals living in the
countryside
,
in particular
young
people
, often on account of increasing their income will work for some firms locating in
cities
although
their accommodations lie on out of the town.
On the other hand
, to those
people
who reckon if we persuade
people
to live in towns,
transportation
problems will be solved, promoting urbanization may be followed by some disadvantages
such
as several environmental problems.
In addition
, living costs in
cities
usually are higher rather than in the
countryside
and
this
can lead to some difficulties for
people
residing in
suburbs
, previously. To recapitulate, persuading
people
to live in the heart of
cities
cannot be an applicable solution for solving
transportation
issues; needless to say, it is better for the government to improve the
transportation
system and provide more vocations in
suburbs
.
Submitted by nataly280480 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • public transportation
  • traffic congestion
  • private vehicles
  • urban areas
  • long commutes
  • population density
  • sustainable transportation
  • efficient transportation options
  • cycling lanes
  • pedestrian pathways
  • advanced transit systems
  • overcrowding
  • transportation infrastructure
  • urban development
  • pollution
  • quality of life
What to do next:
Look at other essays: