Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ?

There are various ways to travel these days

such

Linking Words

as cars or trains. It was thought by some people that governments should endorse the development of railways more than

roads

Use synonyms

or streets. In my opinion, I disagree with

this

Linking Words

statement due to the two following reasons.

First

Linking Words

, all public transportation should be developed equally for citizens. In each country, every type of commuting ways is used. So, those citizens should have satisfaction for all vehicles they used.

Similarly

Linking Words

, it is better if governments interest in both railways and

roads

Use synonyms

.

For example

Linking Words

, imagine you have to travel by train and

then

Linking Words

bus to go to work, you have smooth commuting during sitting in the train but

then

Linking Words

, you ride the bus and are unhappy because of the road surface and environment.

Therefore

Linking Words

, they should be improved in the same manner.

Second

Linking Words

, some country has very bad road systems and their quality. If administrators focus only on trains, they will be worse more and more in the future.

Thus

Linking Words

, it may be not right if the statement is globally used.

For instance

Linking Words

, in my country, Thailand, the

roads

Use synonyms

, streets, and valleys are very crowded and they had bad quality. So, if the Thai government does not solve the problems and interests only trains, the issues will

last

Linking Words

forever.

Consequently

Linking Words

, a development for

roads

Use synonyms

cannot be neglected. To conclude, I personally disagree with the statement because money should be spent on both railways and

roads

Use synonyms

equally.

This

Linking Words

will make them improved in the same way in the future.