Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe It is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views, and give your own opinion.

Aging

Change the spelling

Ageing

show examples

in recent years has become very debatable. Many individuals share the view that new scientific innovations will enable humans to live up to about 100 to 200 years on earth, making it beneficial because it will enable them to live longer with their family members.

However

, I am afraid I have to disagree with its view because it would increase the world’s population and increase environmental pollution.

This

essay will discuss both views in length. The primary reason why individuals share the opinion that living more years on earth is beneficial is that it allows longer time with one's family.

In other words

, the longer humans stay in the world, the closer they are to their families. Imagine, if you will, it present generation living for more than ten decades, knowing more than 4 to 5 generations, becoming great grandparents.

Thus

, resulting in a community of extended families.

On the contrary

, many believe that It is unrealistic mainly because it would increase population, increasing environmental pollution. It implies that more citizens will be subjected to overcrowding,

such

as the spread of airborne diseases.

For example

, the spread of tuberculosis in 1940 in South America took about 300,000 lives. According to Dr Shama Atake, the historian, the spread of its disease resulted from overcrowding.

Hence

, innovations to increase the life cycle would result in severe environmental damage. In conclusion, scientific developments would benefit the community and damage society and citizens' health.

Submitted by arash.dejkameh on Fri Jun 11 2021

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

8Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Grammar mistakes
 

4 paragraphs

241 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 9.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 8.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 8.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 8.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

6.5
band
Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on society?
In this modern era, the number of science students is facing a wretched situation since most of them prefer to choose nonscience subjects in schools. This issue occurs because, commonly, science subjects are expensive and stressful, which clearly makes them avoid this field. As a result, the number of scientists will be diminished, and if this issue is not well tackled, it will cause an uplifting trend in the unemployment rate.
7.5
band
In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?
In certain nations, adults often tell their children that as long as you work hard enough, you can get what you want. It is argued that whether it brings benefits or disasters, I will explore both sides in the following essay.
7.5
band
Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler?
As a result, trips are growing compared with previous periods. Remote work and social media influence can explain this issue. Also, personal growth and cultural enrichment are benefits of travelling.
7
band
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city. Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
There is no denying the fact that the living arrangement of university students is a topic of debate worldwide. While it is a commonly held belief that residing with family provides comfort and support during studies, there is also an argument that living away from home fosters independence and personal growth. This essay will analyze the topic from both points of view and express my opinion.
7
band
Environmental damage is the problem of most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility?
In this day and age, numerous nations are struggling with the problem of a seriously damaged environment. In light of this, the writer contends that the root causes are global urbanization coupled with many manufacturing industries, while it is the accountability of authorities to provide environmental education for the youth that is the most effective approach to address this issue.

Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe It is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views, and give your own opinion.

Word Count

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on society?

In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?

Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler?

In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city. Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

Environmental damage is the problem of most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility?