Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that it is meaningless to protect wild

animals

as they are less useful for humans. I strongly disagree with

this

point of view. From my point of view, I believe that money spent on wildlife is not a waste. It is true that zoos are good resources for education.

This

platform allows humans, especially children, to observe many different types of

animals

with their own eyes.

Moreover

, zoos prevent wild

animals

from extinction influenced by human activities. One of the main activities is illegal hunting that leads to the extinction of wild

animals

.

This

is due to the increasing need for the fur of wild

animals

and ivory at the illegal trade markets.

Therefore

, protecting wildlife is meaningful not only for their own preservation

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

for the education of our future generation.

In addition

, wild

animals

are important to our ecosystem. The food chains will generate chain reactions if one of the species disappears on the earth.

Therefore

, a missing link on the chain will lead to the reduction of food for more creatures.

For example

, many sea

animals

will starve to death if the whale disappears, whose dead body is the main source of food for numerous creatures living underwater.

Besides

, the organic nutrients from

animals

are essential for the growth of plants. By protecting wild creatures, we can

also

preserve the stability of the ecosystem.

Hence

, wild

animals

should be protected to help with ecological balance and diversity. In conclusion, it’s meaningful to conserve wild

animals

because of educational and humanitarian purposes.

Besides

, it’s crucial for maintaining a healthy ecosystem.