Governments should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that countries should allocate more funds to education than to leisure and competitive games. It is agreed that the national budgets should prioritize schools and universities over sports and play.

First

, I will discuss the economic benefits that information can bring to a nation.

Secondly

, the social gains it has. Investing in its study system is one of the best ways to improve a country’s economy. The more people entering the

third

-level study, the more skilled a workforce will be,

this

leads to higher innovation and productivity.

For example

, South Korea and Finland took a decision to invest a large proportion of their budget in schooling and colleges,

this

has reaped prosperity in the form of high-tech companies

such

as Samsung and Nokia.

However

, People cannot work hard all the time and these companies do provide leisure facilities for their workers. Education is not just about improving the economy, it

also

has many social profits. Well educated people tend to be more aware of social evils

such

as drugs, alcohol and sexual health.

For example

, Singapore educates all of its citizens on the dangers of drugs and

this

has resulted in one of the lowest levels of drug abuse in the world. Despite

this

, sports can

also

teach children valuable soft skills

such

as teamwork and work ethic which

also

help curb social ills. In conclusion, education should take precedence over sports and play when it comes to funding due to the many socio-economic benefits it brings. It is recommended that governments continue to pump money into schools and universities in order to realise long-term goals.