world history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is strongly argued, historically, that with
men
in power, the
world
faced more armed conflicts and violent ones than under
women
leadership.
Thus
, to conquer a peaceful life, females are taken as the best
leaders
compared to
men
. In
this
essay, I will discuss my somewhat agreement towards
this
topic. From History books and testimonials, it is a fact that wars and catastrophic events happened under male commands
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
because rarely had a nation
one woman
Add the comma(s)
, one woman,
show examples
as their leader.
Therefore
, I agree that under male command, the
world
had more violent incidents.
Additionally
, in the past, feminine leadership were not
incentive
Correct article usage
an incentive
show examples
neither a highly discussed topic, because
women
barely had their rights
alike
Correct your spelling
like
show examples
to
men
and only in the late twentieth century, they conquered similar positions.
Then
, it is negligent to
corelate
Correct your spelling
correlate
less violent incidents due to more
women
in
front
Add an article
the front
show examples
lead. What is possible to affirm is that, recently, after
Second
World
War the
world
became more diplomatic aligned with
more
Correct article usage
a more
show examples
open-minded and respectful society. After years of malevolence amongst human beings, they become more peaceful, because they accepted differences amongst themselves and
therefore
, they evolved.
Besides
that, they
also
have accepted that
women
could strongly contribute
for
Change preposition
to
show examples
a better
world
. Indeed, it is possible to outline strong
women
who could peacefully avoid conflicts
such
as Margaret Thatcher, known as
iron
Correct article usage
the iron
show examples
women
Fix the agreement mistake
woman
show examples
who lead the UK for fifteen years, faced powerfully
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
Socialism and battled their influence over the British.
Thus
, nations
leaders
regardless
their
Change preposition
of their
show examples
genre have recently praised by peace, and undoubtedly, strong female
leaders
contributed to that once they were in power.
However
,
this
does not make them better
leaders
or more prepared than previous
men
. Certainly, a man would have done the same as Thatcher,
for instance
. In conclusion, I somewhat agree
to
Change preposition
with
show examples
the prompt, because several nations had meaningless
men
leadership who sought blood conflicts
during
Change preposition
for
show examples
centuries.
Nonetheless
, at that time, any country had
women
as a leader,
then
, impossible to relate that with
women
the
world
is more peaceful. In recent decades, it is possible to value female
leaders
who strongly defended their country with no battle conflict,
however
Add a comma
,however
show examples
I believe that
men
would have done alike
Submitted by alexandretco on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: