Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich nations should allow more

refugees

Use synonyms

to enter their borders and support them with food and shelter.

This

Linking Words

essay completely agrees with

this

Linking Words

view because rich

countries

Use synonyms

have enough resources to do

this

Linking Words

, and these

people

Use synonyms

are fleeing from

countries

Use synonyms

that are affected by war and famine. The main reason developed

countries

Use synonyms

should take more displaced

people

Use synonyms

is that they have the financial ability to do so.

Countries

Use synonyms

like Germany, the UK and the USA, have huge budgets that they collect in the form of tax from their citizens and companies operating in their territory. It would only take a tiny fraction of

this

Linking Words

wealth to accommodate and feed millions of poorer

people

Use synonyms

.

For instance

Linking Words

, it is estimated that the European Union’s combined GDP is over $18 trillion, and all of the Syrian

refugees

Use synonyms

could be resettled for less than a billion dollars. Wealthy nations

also

Linking Words

have a moral obligation because

refugees

Use synonyms

are trying to enter their land because their homes have been ruined by war and hunger. No one wants to leave their homeland with their families unless it is essential to do so and if Western

countries

Use synonyms

refuse to take them in, they will certainly be in danger of losing their lives.

For example

Linking Words

,

people

Use synonyms

from Syria have no food and are often caught in the middle of full-scale battles and

that is

Linking Words

the main reason why nearly 5 million of them have escaped. In conclusion, affluent states should help to resettle

refugees

Use synonyms

because they can afford to do so and it will help save lives.