Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems, while others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Recently, it has been increasingly common for organisations like WWF to cooperate with famous singers or renowned actors in order to raise public awareness of certain issues. From my perspective, it can be a brilliant strategy as long as the charity or wildlife groups think twice before deciding which celebrity to work with. What we cannot deny is that under certain circumstances the public tends to pay more attention to the stars, leaving the
problem
unnoticed.To be more specific, some celebrities may have adverse social influence.
For instance
, there are some well-known
people
who uploaded offensive content on social media, were involved in sexual scandals or connived their fans to cyberbully
people
who criticised them.
Therefore
,
support
from a notorious celebrity to aid groups will not be inspiring owing to their detrimental social influence and put off most of the public from learning more about the
problem
that the organisation is trying to solve.
However
,stars do have advantages in presenting the issue to a wider public.Celebrities have natural attention from their fans and some of the numerous followers may look deeper into the organisation as well as the aiding project
as a result
of their idol's leading effect on the followers.
Moreover
,with the help of the paparazzi and the mass media, celebrities can easily broadcast everything they do on the internet or television screens.
Thus
, the
problem
receives more coverage and eventually raise public awareness.
Besides
, being in a high social status, the
support
from renowned
people
is more likely to be persuasive and act as a stronger voice compared to
support
from an ordinary person or normal advertisement.
Therefore
people
are more convinced that the issue is actually serious and look into the
problem
with increased attention. To summarise, the organisation for international aid should avoid stars with adverse social influence, and look for the
support
of renowned
people
as they bring more coverage and has a powerful voice due to their social status.
Submitted by linqunxiong on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • endorse
  • international aid organizations
  • public awareness
  • amplify
  • advocacy
  • systemic change
  • oversimplification
  • trivialization
  • undermining
  • severity
  • misinformed advocacy
  • distorts
  • hamper
  • guided by experts
  • constructive
  • strategically
What to do next:
Look at other essays: