Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In
this
day and age, traffic congestion and accidents have become a topic of interest for a wide range of
people
around the world. Numerous
people
claim that central officials should invest more money in improving railways in order to address the problems that we are facing. From my perspective, I partly agree with
this
statement and suggest that governments should
also
pay attention to the current road system. On the one hand, it is undeniable that the erection of modern railway networks contributes greatly to the convenience and lives of citizens as well as the community. Trains are faster than cars and the majority of transportations, given that they use separated lanes and are capable of running at high speed which ensures they will not be affected by traffic congestion.
Consequently
,
people
can reach their desired location more quickly which saves them a plethora of time for other work.
Additionally
, trains have more space for not only passengers but
also
cargo and goods, which decreases the total number of transportation used.
For example
, more than 100
people
can commute on a single train, compared to 5
people
if they use a private car.
As a result
, providing that the number of transportation will drop, there will be less emission and air pollution, which has an advantageous impact on communal health.
On the other hand
, I believe that governments should
also
improve the present road system. It is clear that the upgrade of railway networks requires an enormous amount of funding, which puts a strain on the national budget of developing countries that are economically disadvantaged. Were they to spend all of their money on constructing railways and trains, they would have nothing left to tackle serious issues
such
as poverty and unemployment, which slows down their growth.
Instead
of that, governments in these nations should concentrate on advancing their existing roads so that their citizens could commute more effortlessly. In conclusion, it is undeniable that railway up-gradation plays a vital role in addressing traffic-related concerns.
Nonetheless
, I advocate that for some nations, developing traditional roads is more beneficial.
Submitted by hathuylinh1806 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: