It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that it is not essential to protect

species

from extinction since it is

intrinsic

Add an article

an intrinsic

show examples

part of life on

this

planet.

This

is an opinion which can strongly be disagreed as will be discussed below. A major reason why humans have a responsibility to avoid the loss of

species

is that the balance of the ecosystem might be disrupted.

That is

to say, all kinds of

animals

are dependent on each other,

hence

the elimination of a specific creature can lead to disruption of the life-cycle. Indeed, biodiversity is important for not only the well-being of

animals

but

also

the health of plants and climate situations.

For instance

, the absence of

animals

that have extinct

such

as pre-historic

species

have had a huge effect on the circumstance of the earth, and as a consequence climate has changed significantly.

Besides

, new medicines and treatments can be found by studying animal

species

. There is no doubt that research on

animals

can result in saving people’s lives as researchers reach new heights in healing people during animal experiments. As well as

this

, it will

also

ensure people that the medicine is safe for human use and has been tested for side effects. Some people,

however

, believe that protecting creatures is too costly because it involves law enforcement, research and security. Since humans should be prioritized above

animals

such

expenses have to be spent on healthcare and the education systems.

Moreover

, many opponents think that not all

animals

are worth saving due to their influence on the planet. To sum up, it is clear that

although

there might be some motivations to stop protecting

animals

, it is vital to keep the earth balanced and preserve all creatures to take advantage of them in experiments.