People sometimes buy products not because they need them but because other people have them. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There is an argument that consumers sometimes pay for some items, not due to their wants but others’ haves. I agree with

this

statement regarding a part of the consumption trends in the modern market, which leads the vast companies to focus on advertisements with many celebrities ordinary people want to resemble, forming emotional bonds among consumers who have bought the particular commodities in common.

First

, today's products promotions televise globally, attracting and targetting the big fans of famous singers and successors. The ads release the fames’ lives with the products to move ones’ minds toward them rather than give enough information about the qualities of the things. According to some interviews on shoppers, impulsive buying has an impact on reducing much stress for exhausted workers since they feel satisfied with just having them regardless of their usefulness.

Finally

, without frighteningly exciting shopping, they would have gotten depressed in their everyday lives.

Second

, humankind tends to pursue emotional bonds with their acquaintances. The more payments economic actors have unreasonably, the stronger desire there is that they socialize with others.

For instance

, recent youngsters in their 20’s and 30’s were into cryptocurrencies

such

as bitcoin and altcoin. Mostly, they know the investment contains an extremely high risk of falling to zero but share the experiences of failure and success with their peers and friends to build deeper relationships.

As a result

, they achieve some feelings of belongings and security, escaping from their lonely life in

this

cynical society. In a nutshell, following others’ buying involves the advantages as I mentioned above to buyers.

Therefore

, the behaviours of spending money on no needs appear occasionally with emotional benefits.