Some feel that countries should produce most of the food that is eaten in their country and import as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The logic that some nations should be self-sufficient in their food production and import as minimal as possible has become progressively contentious. In my opinion, while

this

reform might not be feasible in certain

countries

, the economical implications it would bring are more convincing. The most frequently cited rationale against

this

trend is that few

countries

purely import foods to ensure their survival. These

countries

suffer from numerous potential catastrophes that pose pernicious effects on their farms and local produce. One of the salient illustrations of

this

is often indicated in myriad

countries

in Southeast Asia and the Middle East, which not only have poorly developed infrastructure and little arable soil but

also

are vulnerable to natural disasters. They have to import and stockpile foods

such

as rice to prepare themselves for the worst. Had these nations done differently, they would have starved the entire citizenry in the unlikely event and provoked a detrimental impact on national economic prosperity. Albeit I concede that

this

notion is not viable in some circumstances like the one mentioned, I would still contend that the economy of

countries

adopting

this

will be better served. More production within a nation means more job offers for people, especially those in jeopardy, and consuming these domestic goods and services inherently means feeding the national economy.

This

can be most apparently seen in the home country of technology giants like Samsung and LG - Korea, where the majority of products are nationally produced. Samsung,

for instance

, has been prominent for its diversity in business ranging from technology to real estate to education to even funeral services

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and accounted for a large proportion of the GDP of Korea.

Therefore

, self-supplying within a country confers a valid standpoint as we have witnessed the clear and tangible benefits to the general populace in Korea. In conclusion, the concern for

this

idea can be outweighed by its merits as they do wonders for upward economic growth. In my final thought, governors should propose a more holistic approach in order to strike some balance between imports and exports and mitigate the likely severity of the agriculture-concerned issues.