Some people argue capital punishment is a brutal decision and should be abolished. Do you agree or disagree?

Over the past few years, there witnessed a dramatic increase in the
crime
rate globally. As a matter, many modifications have been made to justify the law in each case. Some people subject that the death penalty should be demolished. From my perspective, I am fully convicted that capital punishment should be kept maintaining the highest level of punishment, and changes should not be made to ensure proper order of the society.
To begin
with, it is widely argued that judicial execution is inhumane to deprive the life of a human.
However
, as history has proved itself, many
crime
commitments have exposed the severity to not only the region but
also
threatened public safety worldwide. To clarify, the case of terrorism that happened in the US on September 11th can be served to prove how deleterious
crime
could be.
Moreover
, some serial assassinations have been performed by killers, causing public confusion and fear in Japan
such
as the case of the Zodiac Killer, who murdered ruthlessly many young innocent women and children just to satisfy his own needs.
Therefore
, these dreadful wrongdoings must be sentenced lawfully to strike balance against the worse deeds in society. Even though a death warrant should not be annihilated,
this
utmost level of sentencing must not be served on a regular basis.
This
type of action should only be executed when the ferocity is at its highest,
such
as in those aforementioned cases.
Likewise
, there are myriad punishments that
also
encourage humanitarianism but still serve law on its right act. Depending on the extremity, public service and monetary fines can be more probable.
For example
, when a juvenile commits vandalism,
instead
of serving a life sentence in jail, he should be put into a rehabilitation camp and do service to understand the bright side of
this
community and be given a chance to reintegrate back into the local when the service is done. Because some
crime
rates during teenage years are just rebellious thoughts against the current world, and most of the perils can be rooted in peer pressure that vandalism is a performance indicating heroism. To conclude, legalized killing should not be put off since some cases are nefarious to the human world, but more moral acts should
also
be encouraged to strengthen the relationship between people and educate former
crime
committers so they can be given a chance to improve their life.
Submitted by yentho.nguyengiang on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • capital punishment
  • deterrent
  • irreversible
  • wrongful conviction
  • moral implications
  • life imprisonment
  • societal impact
  • abolition
  • justice system
  • rehabilitation
  • ethical considerations
  • humanitarian perspectives
What to do next:
Look at other essays: