Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funds from government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree?

It is a heated argument over the decade that artists should be financed by government bodies in a bid to survive or not. I partially agree with the aforementioned statement by saying that little savings should be managed from the budget to ensure the existence of wonderful artwork.
First
and foremost, an artist is God's gift who amazes the populace with their extraordinary talent; a creator could be a writer who appeases peoples' interests with his invaluable scripts on distinctive walks of humans' lives or be a painter who would magnify the beauty of homes' walls with his paintings.
Therefore
, most of the originators, despite being so creative, could not generate enough funds from their artworks and have to come across financial predicaments.
Nevertheless
, the present scenario has put a question on their survival, so, the authorities should help them in some ways like hold an exhibition at governments' expenditures where they can display their creations. To illustrate, the US government has fixed some stipend monthly for their artists to ensure their existence.
Further
, the authorities have way more liabilities to perform towards their residents like investments in the education sector, health care schemes, and road infrastructure that demands more money than others.
For instance
, the residents pay taxes to the regime from their earnings and expect some facilities for the betterment of the inhabitants in return; thereby, the regime has propeller responsibilities to all the public sectors. To conclude
then
, undoubtedly, the originators should be funded by the authorities as artists are the mirror of a country who reflect cultural diversity and present prevailing facts in his work;
thus
, survival money should be allotted to make art alive, howbeit, at the same time, the government budget allocations should be saved for other public sectors like health care and education.
Submitted by parneet.k876 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: