Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime. Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts they reach their decision about case.

By the laws of British and Australia, a jury is forbidden to access the previous criminal documents of the defendant. Some
people
believe that defendants should have the right to protect themselves from being accused of the crime.
However
, many
people
disagree with
this
action and suggest that a jury should be able to access all past data. I totally agree with
this
group of
people
that a jury should consider all documents of the defendant before making a
decision
. To support my statement, in order to make an effective
decision
for punishing someone, we should study in-depth the background of the particular person,
such
as personality, motivation and etc.
Therefore
, it is crucial to perceive their criminal history.
For instance
, a person who have continuously made many cases, there is a possibility that
this
person will create a case again and again without active punishment. By the practice of inaccessibility of the previous criminal data, the
juries
will not have a chance to consider the previous action of the criminal which might affect the result of the trial. It is probably that the criminal would receive too light punishment that they should have been punished.
On the other hand
, many
people
suggest that the laws should provide equality right for the criminals that they should be considered as innocent and the
juries
are not able to use past crimes for making a
decision
. I agree that the criminal should have the right to defend themselves,
,,
Change the punctuation
apply
show examples
however
Add a comma
,however
show examples
providing all backgrounds of the criminals is
also
a great way to prove whether they are truly innocent or not. In conclusion, I disagree with the practice that
juries
are not allowed to reach past criminal documents.
Moreover
, I suggest that
juries
need to access all backgrounds of the defendant in order to provide a considerable
decision
.
Submitted by kongpopb1999 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: