Governments should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The notion of prioritising funding for medicine over environmental
studies
has become progressively contentious. In my opinion, whilst environmental
research
is one way to dig in regarding
climate
heating, more money should be directed towards medical
research
. The most frequently cited rationale for learning about the environmental aspects is the need to understand the effects of
climate
change. As we all know, there is no greater threat to the future of human civilisation than a degrading natural world.
This
can be most apparently seen in billions of dollars being poured into
studies
to analyse how fast the polar ice caps are melting and what the pernicious impact on the ecosystem will be.
Research
grants can be utilised to give
climate
scientists free rein to study and importantly seek out the best reform to the worsening environment. The accumulated evidence has reasoned why allocating more funds towards researching the environment is convincing. Albeit conceding the presented merits of environmental
studies
, I would still contend that
health
is a more pressing concern.
This
argument rests on the fact that medical
research
is unequivocally positive, unlike
climate
studies
which are often misleading and unclear. One of the salient illustrations of
this
is often reported in myriad advances in
health
over the several decades including increased understanding of mental illness, fewer procedures for surgery, and better vaccines, which have all been put into practice.
Furthermore
, more money allocation can open up possibilities for new medical innovations involving genetic modification and greater comprehension of disease prevention.
Therefore
, the government raising subsidies for
this
field confers a valid standpoint as we have witnessed the clear and tangible impact on the overall
health
of the general populace. In conclusion, the value of environmental
research
cannot outweigh that of medicine as
this
does wonder for one's
health
. In my final thought, governors and
health
regulators should propose a more holistic approach in order to strike some balance between environmental and medical
studies
but prioritise the latter.
Submitted by vuanhhibstrading on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: